Change Data Capture (CDC) Overview
What is Change Data Capture?
Change Data Capture (CDC) is a software design pattern that identifies and captures changes made to data in a database, then delivers those changes in real-time to downstream consumers like applications, data warehouses, or analytics systems.
Real-time Analytics
Enable real-time business intelligence and analytics by streaming data changes as they occur.
Data Synchronization
Keep multiple systems in sync by propagating changes across different databases and applications.
Audit Trails
Maintain comprehensive audit logs by capturing all data modifications with timestamps.
Event-Driven Architecture
Build reactive systems that respond to data changes in real-time.
MongoDB Approach
Change Streams: Native, real-time change detection built into the database core. Leverages the oplog (operations log) to provide a unified API for watching changes across collections, databases, or entire clusters.
- Built-in feature since MongoDB 3.6
- Works with replica sets and sharded clusters
- Aggregation pipeline integration
- Resume tokens for fault tolerance
PostgreSQL Approach
Multiple Methods: PostgreSQL offers several CDC approaches including logical replication, triggers, LISTEN/NOTIFY, and third-party solutions like Debezium that leverage Write-Ahead Logs (WAL).
- Logical replication (PostgreSQL 10+)
- Trigger-based solutions
- LISTEN/NOTIFY for simple notifications
- WAL-based tools (Debezium, etc.)
MongoDB Change Streams Deep Dive
๐ Key Advantages of MongoDB Change Streams
MongoDB's Change Streams provide a native, scalable, and developer-friendly approach to CDC that's deeply integrated with the database architecture.
Basic Change Stream Implementation
Real-time Updates
Changes are streamed in real-time as they occur, with minimal latency.
Operation Types
Captures insert, update, delete, replace, and invalidate operations.
Advanced Change Stream Features
Resume Tokens & Fault Tolerance
Full Document Lookup
Cluster-wide Change Streams
Sharded Cluster Support
Native Sharding Support: Change streams work seamlessly across sharded clusters, automatically handling shard key distribution and routing. Each shard contributes its changes to a unified stream.
Advanced Filtering with Aggregation Pipeline
Time-based Filtering
โ MongoDB Change Streams Advantages
- Native database feature - no external tools needed
- Works across replica sets and sharded clusters
- Aggregation pipeline filtering capabilities
- Resume tokens for fault tolerance
- Low latency real-time streaming
- Automatic handling of cluster topology changes
- No impact on application performance
โ ๏ธ Considerations
- Requires replica set (not available on standalone)
- Limited to MongoDB 3.6+ (full features in 4.0+)
- Resume window limited by oplog size
- Large result sets may impact performance
PostgreSQL Change Data Capture Methods
Trigger-based Change Detection
โ Trigger Advantages
- Simple to implement and understand
- Automatic execution on data changes
- Can capture detailed change information
- Works with any PostgreSQL version
โ ๏ธ Trigger Limitations
- Performance overhead on writes
- Synchronous execution blocks transactions
- Difficult to scale
- Manual setup for each table
- Can cause cascading trigger issues
Logical Replication (PostgreSQL 10+)
โ Logical Replication Advantages
- Native PostgreSQL feature
- Asynchronous processing
- Row-level filtering possible
- Good performance characteristics
โ ๏ธ Limitations
- Requires PostgreSQL 10+
- Complex setup and configuration
- Limited to table-level granularity
- Requires careful slot management
LISTEN/NOTIFY for Simple Change Notifications
โ LISTEN/NOTIFY Advantages
- Very lightweight
- Real-time notifications
- Simple to implement
- Low overhead
โ ๏ธ Limitations
- Limited payload size (8KB)
- No persistence - lost on disconnect
- No guaranteed delivery
- Single database only
WAL-based Tools (Debezium, etc.)
โ WAL-based Advantages
- High throughput and scalability
- Exactly-once delivery guarantees
- Schema evolution support
- Integration with Kafka ecosystem
- No application code changes needed
โ ๏ธ Limitations
- Complex setup and configuration
- Requires additional infrastructure
- External dependency management
- Learning curve for operations
Detailed Comparison: MongoDB vs PostgreSQL CDC
MongoDB Change Streams
Architecture
- Built into database core
- Uses oplog (operations log)
- Native aggregation pipeline
- Distributed across shards
Scalability
- Horizontal scaling with sharding
- Cluster-wide change streams
- Automatic shard management
- High throughput (1M+ ops/sec)
Developer Experience
- Single API for all change types
- Rich filtering with aggregation
- Resume tokens for fault tolerance
- Multiple language drivers
PostgreSQL CDC Options
Architecture
- Multiple approaches available
- WAL-based or trigger-based
- External tools often required
- Master-slave replication model
Scalability
- Vertical scaling primarily
- Read replicas for scaling reads
- Sharding requires external tools
- High throughput with tuning
Developer Experience
- Different APIs for different methods
- SQL-based filtering
- Manual fault tolerance setup
- Mature ecosystem
Feature Comparison Matrix
Feature | MongoDB Change Streams | PostgreSQL (Best Option) |
---|---|---|
Real-time Streaming | Native | With tools |
Fault Tolerance | Resume tokens | Manual setup |
Filtering Capabilities | Aggregation pipeline | SQL WHERE clauses |
Horizontal Scaling | Native sharding | External solutions |
Setup Complexity | Simple | Complex |
Performance Impact | Minimal | Varies by method |
Multi-database Support | Cluster-wide | Single database |
Operational Overhead | Low | High |
Interactive Change Data Capture Demo
๐ MongoDB Change Streams Simulator
Experience how MongoDB Change Streams work in real-time. Click the buttons below to simulate different database operations.
โก Performance Comparison
See how different CDC approaches compare in terms of latency and throughput.
๐ What This Demo Shows
This interactive demo simulates the real-world behavior of change data capture systems. In production:
- MongoDB Change Streams provide sub-10ms latency for most operations
- Resume tokens allow applications to recover from exactly where they left off
- Aggregation pipeline filtering reduces network traffic and processing overhead
- Cluster-wide streams automatically handle sharding and replica set changes
Performance Analysis & Benchmarks
Latency Comparison
MongoDB Change Streams
- Insert latency: 1-3ms
- Update latency: 2-5ms
- Delete latency: 1-2ms
- Network overhead: Minimal
- CPU impact: <5%
PostgreSQL Methods
- Triggers: 10-50ms (synchronous)
- Logical replication: 5-20ms
- LISTEN/NOTIFY: 1-5ms
- WAL-based tools: 10-100ms
- CPU impact: 10-30%
Scaling Characteristics
Throughput Scaling
MongoDB: Linear scaling with sharding. Each shard can handle 100K+ ops/sec independently.
PostgreSQL: Vertical scaling primarily. Triggers can become bottleneck at high write volumes.
Connection Scaling
MongoDB: Thousands of concurrent change streams with minimal overhead.
PostgreSQL: Limited by connection pool and replication slot management.
Memory Usage
MongoDB: Constant memory usage regardless of change volume.
PostgreSQL: Memory usage varies significantly by CDC method chosen.
Reliability
MongoDB: Built-in resume capabilities, automatic failover handling.
PostgreSQL: Reliability depends on external tooling and configuration.
๐ฏ Performance Summary
MongoDB Change Streams consistently deliver superior performance characteristics due to their native integration with the database engine. The oplog-based approach provides predictable latency and scales horizontally without additional complexity.
Recommendations & Best Practices
๐ When to Choose MongoDB Change Streams
MongoDB Change Streams are the optimal choice for modern applications requiring real-time data synchronization, event-driven architectures, and scalable change data capture.
Ideal Use Cases
- Real-time analytics dashboards
- Event-driven microservices
- Data synchronization across systems
- Audit logging and compliance
- Cache invalidation strategies
- Live collaborative applications
Implementation Best Practices
- Use aggregation pipelines for filtering
- Implement proper error handling
- Store resume tokens for fault tolerance
- Monitor oplog size and retention
- Use appropriate batch sizes
- Test failover scenarios
Monitoring & Operations
- Track change stream lag metrics
- Monitor memory and CPU usage
- Set up alerting for stream failures
- Regular resume token cleanup
- Capacity planning for growth
- Performance baseline establishment
Advanced Configurations
- Custom aggregation stages
- Multi-collection watching
- Cluster-wide change detection
- Time-based filtering
- Full document lookup optimization
- Shard key considerations
Architecture Decision Framework
Choose MongoDB When:
- Building new applications
- Requiring horizontal scalability
- Need sub-10ms change latency
- Want minimal operational overhead
- Implementing event-driven architecture
- Working with document/JSON data
- Need cluster-wide change detection
Consider PostgreSQL When:
- Existing PostgreSQL infrastructure
- Strong ACID requirements
- Complex relational queries needed
- Team expertise in SQL/PostgreSQL
- Regulatory compliance requirements
- Budget constraints (open source)
- Simple change detection needs
๐ฏ Key Takeaways
- MongoDB Change Streams provide the most comprehensive, scalable, and developer-friendly CDC solution available today
- Native integration eliminates the complexity and operational overhead of external CDC tools
- Real-time performance with sub-10ms latency makes MongoDB ideal for modern reactive applications
- Horizontal scaling with sharding ensures the solution grows with your business needs
- Resume tokens and fault tolerance features provide enterprise-grade reliability